Stack the Tech: the right tech and the right signals
What this does
Assembles the stack for one workflow: the tech that carries the data and the signals that give it context. The point is not to shop for tools or to rebuild infrastructure. It is to give this specific workflow the right inputs, so it runs on real context instead of a lone tool guessing.
What you'll need
One workflow with its steps and its crux named (the output of Solve the Problem). No connectors required to plan the stack.
The method
- Walk the steps and name the context each one needs. For account prep: which account, what fit, what timing, what history. Context is the signal a step needs to do its job.
- For each step, name the signal first, then the tech that carries it. Fit is a signal (your ICP model). Timing is a signal (intent, product usage). The CRM, the enrichment vendor, the dialer are tech that carry data. Signal first, tech second.
- Buy the plumbing, build the thin edge. Buy the commodity tech you would be crazy to rebuild. Build only the small layer that is your advantage: the scoring logic, the rules, the view. Most of the edge is signal logic, not infrastructure.
- Assemble the context, do not just connect tools. A stack of tools with no signals is plumbing with nothing flowing through it. The output of this move is the workflow running on the right signals.
- Decide per workflow. The signals and tech that fit this workflow may be wrong for the next. The unit is the workflow, not the contract.
Failure points
- Buying a platform and calling it context. A tool is not a signal.
- Wiring up tools with no signal flowing through them.
- Rebuilding infrastructure because building feels productive.
The receipt
[the signals you stacked, the tech that carries them, and the context the workflow now runs on]
Next move
Hand the stacked workflow to Cut the Drag. Built GTM. Receipts only.