── PLAYBOOK · GTM STRATEGY

Reprice to de-risk your revenue

Per-seat pricing bets your revenue on your customer's headcount. Reprice to capture the value you create and de-risk the base.

Install the whole playbook ↓

[ BUILT GTM ]

Reprice to de-risk your revenue

Solvethe problem worth solving

Problem · 01GTM Strategy

Per-seat pricing bets your revenue on your customer's headcount.

Reprice to capture the value you create and de-risk the base.

Stackthe workflow, box by box

Salesforce01

Reprice and repackage so your revenue is more predictable.

Find where the model breaks and propose a value metric and tiers as a hypothesis, numbers to validate next, not to ship yet.

Powers up with

Claude02

Design a customer-interview study and turn transcripts into messaging.

Test that hypothesis with real buyers before any number gets finalized; what they say sets the actual metric and tiers.

Connect to analyze

Claude03

Write positioning your whole team can repeat the same way.

Frame the buyer-validated packaging on value, not features.

Connect to analyze

Salesforce04

Put a one-page business case in the committee's hands.

Justify the validated change to the accounts it affects most.

Powers up with

Splithow control passes: agents branch left, humans right

HUMAN + AI, IN THE LOOP

How control passes.

AgentsHuman

Agent01

Reprice and repackage so your revenue is more predictable.

Salesforce runs it.

Agent02

Design a customer-interview study and turn transcripts into messaging.

Claude runs it.

Agent03

Write positioning your whole team can repeat the same way.

Claude runs it.

Agent04

Put a one-page business case in the committee's hands.

Salesforce runs it.

The skills run the work. You stay in the loop on the calls that need judgment.

Outputwhat the workflow produces

OUTPUT · 01

A value metric

OUTPUT · 02

Clean tiers validated with real buyers

OUTPUT · 03

The positioning that frames it

OUTPUT · 04

A business case for the accounts it hits hardest

Outcomethe result it drives

OUTCOME · 01

Contraction risk down, deal size up

Repriced off per-seat to value-based packaging: contraction risk fell and average deal size grew, the two effects this play actually modeled.

Built GTM

── 01 / WHY RUN IT

Per-seat pricing means your revenue rises and falls with your customer's headcount, not with the value you deliver. A layoff at their company becomes a contraction at yours, and you find out the pricing model was never really yours to control.

RUN THIS AND YOU CAN

✓A value metric buyers actually believe is fair, tested before it ships

✓Clean tiers and a migration path so existing customers glide over

✓Positioning that frames the change on value, not a price hike

✓A business case for the accounts the change hits hardest

── 02 / THE RUN, STEP BY STEP

The workflow that solves it, one step at a time.

Each step is the plain question you are already asking. The skills answer them in order, one handing its receipt to the next.

1✓ TESTED

Reprice and repackage so your revenue is more predictable.

Move off pure per-seat, decide what to meter and what to bundle, set the tiers, and model the impact on deal size and win rate before you change a thing.

YOU GETThe failure point, the value metric, the tiers, and the modeled impact.

POWER IT UP

OPEN THE SKILL →

2✓ TESTED

Design a customer-interview study and turn transcripts into messaging.

Who to talk to, a non-leading interview guide, and how to turn transcripts into positioning and messaging inputs.

YOU GETThe interview slate, the non-leading guide, and transcripts-to-positioning.

POWER IT UP

OPEN THE SKILL →

3✓ TESTED

Write positioning your whole team can repeat the same way.

Turns what you do, who it's for, and why you win into one positioning statement and a full message house.

YOU GETThe positioning statement, the value pillars, the proof points, and objection reframes.

POWER IT UP

OPEN THE SKILL →

4✓ TESTED

Put a one-page business case in the committee's hands.

Frames the cost of the problem, the change, the value model, and the risk of doing nothing, in the buyer's own numbers.

YOU GETThe cost-of-problem, the value math, the cost of inaction, and flagged assumptions.

POWER IT UP

OPEN THE SKILL →

WHERE YOU LAND

A value metric and clean tiers validated with real buyers, the positioning that frames it, a business case for the accounts it hits hardest, and the modeled impact before you change a thing.

EVERY STEP, TESTED AND PASSED

EVAL RESULTPASS4/4 dimensions

HOW WE EVAL →

✓Skills resolve

✓Structure + proof

✓Example chat

✓Quality judge

All 4 chained skills resolve to real, scored skills.
Has a problem, an outcome, 2+ steps, and proof from a real build.
Ships an example chat showing the play run in Claude.
Reads in plain operator voice, grounded in a real build.

Last eval run 2026-08-05

DEEP EVAL · PASS

THE STANDARD →

We did not just check the structure. A judge read this play against the full text of every skill it chains (composition), then ran it on a real scenario end to end (simulated). It passed both. Test scenario: A founder on pure per-seat pricing is watching customer layoffs contract revenue and wants to reprice without guessing.

── 03 / SEE IT RUN

Watch the skills answer in order.

Describe your situation in plain language. The right skill fires on its own and hands its receipt to the next.

EXAMPLE CHATElena, Founder, running the loop in one sitting

We charge per seat and our revenue swings every time a customer does layoffs. I want to reprice so it is not tied to their headcount. Where does the model break?

Step 1· Pricing Packaging

Per seat bets your revenue on their headcount, so a layoff hits you too. I mapped where the model breaks, proposed a value metric that grows with the outcome you deliver, drafted clean tiers around it, and sketched a migration path, all as a hypothesis to test with buyers before anything ships.

Receipt

Proposed value metric: workflows automated; draft tiers and a 12-month grandfather path; modeling suggests contraction risk could drop from 18% to 7% of ARR, pending buyer validation.

Before we commit, what do buyers actually think is fair to pay for?

Step 2· Customer Research

Before that metric ships, I built interviews to test it with real buyers and turn what they say into the final pricing input. The point is to hear what they believe they are buying, not to lead them to our answer.

Receipt

Guide plus 10 customers interviewed; they anchor on outcomes, not seats, confirming the proposed metric before it gets finalized.

Help me frame the new packaging so it lands on value, not as a price hike.

Step 3· Positioning Brief

I wrote the positioning for the new packaging around the value it captures, with the pillars, the proof, and reframes for the pushback you will get. The story is what you deliver, not what you charge per head.

Receipt

Message house built; lead pillar is cost per automated workflow, with 3 proof points.

Now give me something to justify the change to the accounts it hits hardest.

Step 4· Business Case

I built a one-page case in each account's own numbers: the cost of the problem, the value model, and the risk of doing nothing. It is aimed at the handful of accounts where the change moves the most money.

Receipt

Case for the top 12 affected accounts; the median lands as a 14% increase justified by a sub-6-month payback.

── 04 / SEE IT IN PRODUCTION

Before you run it, I ran it for real.

This workflow is genericized from a real build. Here is the number it moved, and what I actually did.

THE BUILD · PRICING + PACKAGING

Reprice to De-risk

+30%

average deal size, after value-based repackaging

40% to <15%

active users on free plans, cut by the PLG motion

Seats to value

off a pure seat-based license model

Expansion up

land-and-expand lifted organic growth revenue

WHAT I DID ›

Reprice to value, not seats. I repriced and repackaged so revenue was tied to the value delivered, not the number of seats occupied. That de-risked the base: a customer could reorganize without the contract falling apart, and we could grow an account on something other than headcount.

Redesign the free-to-paid boundary. I redesigned the line so real usage had a reason to convert, instead of living free forever.

Fix the model, not just the paywall. The lazy read is to chase free users into a wall. That does not hold. We fixed the model underneath first, then the conversion followed.

If your revenue moves one-for-one with your customers' seat counts, you do not have a pricing model, you have a beta on their headcount. Package around the value. It de-risks the base and, done right, it makes the deal easier to say yes to.

Dig into the full build →

05 / INSTALL THE WHOLE PLAYBOOK

One plugin. 4 skills, bundled.

The whole playbook installs as a single plugin in Claude Code, no copy-pasting 4 times. Or grab any single step above. It runs on what you paste; connect your stack to go live.

OR KICK IT OFF IN CHAT

“Here is my situation: [describe your workflow or account in a sentence or two]. Walk me through Reprice to de-risk your revenue step by step, and run each skill as we go.”

── GET THE NEXT PLAYBOOK

Reprice to de-risk your revenue

Reprice to de-risk your revenue

Per-seat pricing bets your revenue on your customer's headcount.

A value metric

Clean tiers validated with real buyers

The positioning that frames it

A business case for the accounts it hits hardest

Contraction risk down, deal size up

The workflow that solves it, one step at a time.

Watch the skills answer in order.

Before you run it, I ran it for real.

One plugin. 4 skills, bundled.

One runnable workflow a week. Free.